Share Your Case
Many people are told their situation is “too complex” because it crosses multiple systems.
This project documents what happens when complexity becomes a reason for inaction.
Submit Your CaseDocumenting the Institutional Escalation Gap
Many people experience serious situations that involve multiple institutions at the same time.
Medical systems
Financial institutions
Employers
Legal systems
Government agencies
In many of these cases, each institution only reviews its own portion of the situation. As a result, the broader pattern may never be evaluated.
This information helps identify patterns that are currently invisible within individual systems. If your experience fits the criteria below, you may submit your case for documentation.
Eligibility Criteria
To maintain credibility and accuracy, submissions must meet the following criteria. Your situation should include:
Incidents involving two or more institutions
- medical systems
- financial institutions
- workplaces
- legal systems
- government agencies
- social services
Documented evidence
Submissions should include records such as:
- emails
- letters
- reports
- case numbers
- court records
- medical documentation
- internal complaints
Clear timeline
Your submission should include a timeline showing how the situation developed across institutions.
Demonstrable consequences
- financial losses
- legal disputes
- employment disruption
- medical complications
- housing instability
- institutional non-response
Prior attempts to seek resolution
- internal complaints
- regulatory reports
- agency filings
- legal consultations
Case Submission Form
Once submitted, cases are reviewed for documentation clarity and relevance to the institutional escalation gap. If additional information is needed, the team may contact you.
Submit Your CaseImportant note: this platform does not provide legal or medical services. Its purpose is to document patterns and contribute to public understanding of institutional response gaps.
What Happens After Submission
Submitted cases are reviewed to determine whether they reflect patterns relevant to the institutional escalation gap. Approved cases may contribute to:
Pattern documentation
Research into institutional response gaps
Policy discussions about multi-system accountability
Investigative reporting opportunities
Personal identifying information will not be published without consent.
Why Documentation Matters
Many institutions operate within defined boundaries.
When situations span multiple systems, responsibility can become unclear. Each institution may close its portion of the case while the broader pattern remains unresolved. Documenting these patterns helps demonstrate where coordination between institutions may be missing.